Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheWineConversation/~3/uTwBfFeAujs/
Armagnac XO Lauboude NV Croix de Salle Armagnac Domaine du Peyrot Alter Ego de Palmer Angelus
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheWineConversation/~3/uTwBfFeAujs/
Armagnac XO Lauboude NV Croix de Salle Armagnac Domaine du Peyrot Alter Ego de Palmer Angelus
Odds and ends from a life lived through the prism of the wine glass …
The Best Blog that’s not a Blog Pt. II
I’ve mentioned Garagiste and their daily email wine sales offers in the past. The Seattle-based wine purveyor is notable not just for their wine offerings (which are stunning), but also for how that offer is presented—their long-form daily email missives represent some of the best wine writing found anywhere.
For entirely different reasons, you can add Bottlenotes to that list as well (subscribe to their email at this link). If you’re not already a subscriber to Bottlenotes daily email, The Daily Sip, you should be. Since hiring Eric Arnold (ex-Wine Spectator and author of First Big Crush) as Editorial Director in April of last year, Bottlenotes has come to represent one of the best daily wine-related reads anywhere.

Taking a less wine-specific approach and focusing on wine people, personalities and stories, Arnold has proven he has a nose for interesting angles while asking the right questions. His writing leaves a reader satisfied with something they didn’t know beforehand, a neat trick given that every single wine-interested reader comes at the subject with a different point of view and knowledge base.
Case in point: Recently, Arnold featured a little known documentary making the rounds of screenings that features Julian Faulkner, a young Provence winemaker, and his struggles in the global marketplace. Arnold’s interview with Faulkner’s New York-based importer (Brian DiMarco of Barterhouse) caused me to pluck my wallet out of my pocket and buy the DVD. The documentary called “Escaping Robert Parker” uses Parker as the foil for the idealistic Faulkner, perhaps not as successfully as Arnold’s writing intrigues, but the documentary is wholly satisfying none the less.
In the documentary, Faulkner discusses a good wine not as a vehicle for critical acclaim, but as being good when it, “Gives pleasure.” It’s an oft-repeated phrase from the anti-Parker set, but Faulkner’s earnestness sells it as meaningful.
Overall, Arnold’s daily writing and the documentary are both satisfying ways to spend time if you’re a wine enthusiast.
Escaping Education
Speaking of “Escaping Robert Parker” and wine that, “Gives pleasure,” Elin McCoy (author of The Emperor of Wine), is featured in several vignettes in the documentary discussing the state of popular wine criticism – a part of wine appreciation that she describes as a declining need for younger wine consumers.
The role of the wine critic is a complicated subject, not easily placed within a neat box and a subject in which any opinion could be held up as having a shred of truth to it. Yet, in general, McCoy’s notion that critical scores are less important to younger wine consumers rings true.

I believe that not only is the role of the critic changing, but so too is the notion of education.
Historically, the wine business has lived off the “core” wine consumer – the small percentage of wine drinkers that drive over 90% of wine sales. So, when you see research from the Wine Market Council that indicates 1 in 2 Millenials are coming into wine as a “core” consumer it’s easy to see why the industry is excited.
By sheer numbers, life is good and going to get better ... from a volume sales perspective.
However, the wine industry in a macro sense encompasses more than just wine – it also includes all of the peripheral activities that educate about wine, as well – magazines, books, events, etc. and the entire picture can’t be viewed through rose colored glasses.
It’s the education portion that I think is in for the most dynamic change over the course of the next decade.
In large part, wine enthusiasm is a singular pursuit and serious wine lovers are known for being inveterate learners – reading books, educating themselves, tasting, traveling and then reading some more.
However, anecdotally, I’m seeing significantly less interest in younger consumers learning about wine as avocation, and instead merely looking at wine as something that, “Gives pleasure,” as Julian Faulkner so noted.
Last weekend my wife and I held an engagement party for my 26-year-old sister-in-law, her fiancé and their wedding party, all the same age, all 25 or 26 years old. The party was wine themed. Everybody was wine-interested. A lot of wine was drunk. My takeaway is that the importance of wine in that setting is its role as a social beverage. Education or knowledge aside from the correct pronunciation of names and regions and whether or not the wine is good (or not) is about all that matters, even amongst people with the same interest.
The implications for this can’t be understated. There was no geek talk. No discussions of alcohol percentages, styles, or anything remotely deeper than enjoying each other’s company with a glass of vino. This amongst a wine crowd.
I might be crazy, but if I were a wine educator, or a wine writer that focused on education, I would shift my focus not on the minutia of wine appreciation, but on the mechanics of how to say Chateauneuf-du-Pape without looking like an idiot alongside reviewing wine faults. That’s it.
How do you pronounce it and is it good, bad, or flawed?
Everything else is details, and, well, nowadays, there’s enough going on without needless detail…Right?
Source: http://goodgrape.com/index.php/site/field_notes_from_a_wine_life_benign_apathy_edition/
Guadet Guadet Saint Julien Haut Bages Liberal Haut Bailly Haut Batailley
Source: http://winewithmark.info/archives/628
Cos d\\\'Estournel Couspaude Couvent des Jacobins Croix de Labrie Croizet Bages
Cabernet Sauvinon Wine and Cheese Wine Rack French Wine Wine Making
![]() |
| Photo Credit: kaiban |
Haut Bailly Haut Batailley Haut Batailley Rare Signed Marie Jeanne Haut Brion Haut Marbuzet
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/vagablond/ysSN/~3/kqwr5UxZmSE/
La Fleur Cardinale La Fleur de Bouard La Fleur de Gay La Gaffeliere La Garde
Source: http://www.wine4freaks.com/46/canonica-a-cerreto-sandiavolo-2004/
Angelus Ausone Ausone (Cut Capsule) Ausone (Soiled Label) Bahans Haut Brion
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gangofpour/uncZ/~3/I_o-NxhHaB0/jumpin-jim-lester
Latour a Pomerol Laville Haut Brion Le Gay Le Moulin Le Moulin Pomerol
Rodney Strong, Pinot Noir 2009 originally appeared on Winecast. Licensed under Creative Commons.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Winecast/~3/RfxNKhPlt8k/
Le Tertre Roteboeuf l\\\'Eglise Clinet l\\\'Enclos Leoville Barton Leoville Las Cases
Introducing Winecast Insider originally appeared on Winecast. Licensed under Creative Commons.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Winecast/~3/LS8JL0Qhigg/
Grand Puy Lacoste Gruaud Larose Guadet Guadet Saint Julien Haut Bages Liberal
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/blogspot/GuSC/~3/8-6pzvIaFsw/
Caronne Ste Gemme Carruades de Lafite Certan de May Charmail Chasse Spleen
Glen Ellen, Petite Sirah 2007 originally appeared on Winecast. Licensed under Creative Commons.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Winecast/~3/bmDbiM7S5nI/
Food and Wine Leisure Food Armagnac Baron de Lustrac Armagnac Baron de Sigognac Armagnac Baron de Sigognac ans
Source: http://www.beyondnapavalley.com/blog/win-tickets-to-zaps-2011-grand-zinfandel-tasting-at-fort-mason/
Ausone Ausone (Cut Capsule) Ausone (Soiled Label) Bahans Haut Brion Barde Haut
Davis Bynum, Pinot Noir 2008 originally appeared on Winecast. Licensed under Creative Commons.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Winecast/~3/6sxRm_z4EEU/
Haut Bages Liberal Haut Bailly Haut Batailley Haut Batailley Rare Signed Marie Jeanne Haut Brion
Beau Site Beaumont Beausejour Becot Beausejour Duffau Lagarrosse Bel Air Lalande de Pomerol
Who Will Be The First Wine Blogger Who Raps? originally appeared on Winecast. Licensed under Creative Commons.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Winecast/~3/phZa9getlqs/
Source: http://www.winecountrygetaways.com/napablog/amizetta-winery-%e2%80%93-hidden-gem-since-1981/
La Croix du Casse La Fleur Cardinale La Fleur de Bouard La Fleur de Gay La Gaffeliere
Source: http://thegrapesaroundtexas.com/2011/02/26/new-look-for-the-grapes-around-texas/
Source: http://www.beyondnapavalley.com/blog/the-top-10-wines-of-2010/
Source: http://winewithmark.info/archives/632
Beau Site Beaumont Beausejour Becot Beausejour Duffau Lagarrosse Bel Air Lalande de Pomerol
Source: http://www.beyondnapavalley.com/blog/review-of-chelan-ridge-winery/
Pavie Pavie Decesse Pavie Macquin Pavillon Rouge du Margaux Pinot Noir
Haut Bages Liberal Haut Bailly Haut Batailley Haut Batailley Rare Signed Marie Jeanne Haut Brion
A Wine for Tonight: NV Domaine Ste. Michelle Brut was originally posted on Wine Peeps. Wine Peeps - Your link to great QPR wines from Washington State and beyond.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WinePeeps/~3/B0wlCVylbpk/
La Reserve du Generale La Tour Figeac La Tour Haut Brion La Tour Martillac Labegorce Zede
Source: http://www.wine4freaks.com/44/wines-from-pierre-usseglio-1/
Lynch Moussas Magdelaine Magrez Fombrauge Malartic Lagraviere Malescot St. Exupery
Rodney Strong Single Vineyards: Rockaway and Brothers Ridge was originally posted on Wine Peeps. Wine Peeps - Your link to great QPR wines from Washington State and beyond.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WinePeeps/~3/mmNLzQC4XTQ/
Belgrave Bellefont Belcier Bellevue Mondotte Berliquet Beychevelle
A Wine for Tonight: NV Domaine Ste. Michelle Brut was originally posted on Wine Peeps. Wine Peeps - Your link to great QPR wines from Washington State and beyond.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WinePeeps/~3/B0wlCVylbpk/
Cantenac Brown Carillon d\\\'Angelus Caronne Ste Gemme Carruades de Lafite Certan de May
Pavie Macquin Pavillon Rouge du Margaux Pinot Noir Cabernet Sauvinon Wine and Cheese
A Wine for Tonight: NV Domaine Ste. Michelle Brut was originally posted on Wine Peeps. Wine Peeps - Your link to great QPR wines from Washington State and beyond.
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WinePeeps/~3/B0wlCVylbpk/
Pape Clement Patache d\\\'Aux Pavie Pavie Decesse Pavie Macquin
For about $100, the cost for a couple of profile tests, I’ve gotten to know myself better and hopefully you’ll get to know me better, as well.
Why would you even care? Maybe you don’t, but as a reader of this site you are a participant in reading the scribbling’s of an online wine writer. As Woody Allen said, “90% of life is just showing up.” By showing up, you are part of my wine life as well as others that take to their computers to live their wine life out loud.
Recently, spurred by year’s long acrimony that continues to rear its head every couple of months, I’ve been thinking deeply about how to overcome what I perceive to be a lack of institutional trust with online wine writers. It seems it’s not enough to write well, often and with knowledge of the subject. Derision is still manifest. This derision is not necessarily directed at me, but of the genre of online wine writing in which I choose to participate.

I have identified four contributing factors:
Systemic skepticism. Our national trust, according to the 11th annual Edelman Trust Barometer, has fallen precipitously low across business, government, non-profit and media. There’s never been a better time to not trust what you hear, see or read.
Information ubiquity. There’s too much information and opinion. The signal-to-noise ratio is dangerously skewing towards noise. While I don’t have facts to back it up, I would hazard a guess that the last five years has seen a greater quantity of wine writing than the previous 20 years combined. Here, when everybody is a critic, nobody is a critic. Put another way, when you’re supposed to trust everybody you end up trusting nobody.
Insularity. When I made my two year long sojourn into the wine business, virtually every meeting amongst relative strangers started with a recitation of their resume; this is a phenomenon I’ve not seen repeated in other industries. In the wine business, your credibility was vetted within five minutes based on who you know and where you’ve worked, not your bona fides. It seems interlopers need to earn their merit badge, a difficult and long proposition denoted by tacit approval and tenure, not a meritocracy.
Brands. Whether we want to admit it or not, brands, especially media brands, lend credibility to writers. Without naming names, a review of the weekly Wine Opinions “Wine Review Weekly” will reveal wine writers with column inches in major dailies that possess less experience than many online wine writers who don’t have a masthead with an engendered brand that burnishes their personal star by proxy. When talent is equal between two writers, the reader will defer to a brand—that’s marketing 101, and true of our media consumption, as well.
But, where to go from here?

Recently, online wine writer Pamela Heiligenthal asked an open-ended question about whether online wine writers should earn one of the alphabet soup wine certifications. She took lumps for her opinion, but I have a hard time arguing with her premise. Those that are serious about wine and writing will undertake a commitment to demonstrate knowledge in the form of academic achievement. Absent a brand, demonstrated knowledge is a hallmark of credibility. And, online wine writers will likely always face limited resources in creating a trustworthy brand.
In addition to demonstrated wine knowledge, I would also humbly suggest a move towards conscientious disclosure that leads to a holistic professional view of a writer that engenders trust.
In the realm of consulting and services-based business development, a touchstone is a book and philosophy called, “The Trusted Advisor.” The premise of the book is the equation that goes into creating trust-based relationships with your clients. In the case of the online wine writer the clients are readers.
In my view, the notion of so-called “transparency” online is a false positive and a little bit of bullshit, because a reader doesn’t know if you’re trustworthy so quantifiably alleviating that question is an imperative. Addressing that, a methodology has grown up around, “The Trusted Advisor” and includes a “Trust Quotient.” In loose terms, a Trust Quotient is made up of your credibility, reliability, and intimacy, divided by your self-orientation.

The Trust Quotient begins to alleviate whether an online wine writer can be “quote/unquote” trusted. But, it’s not the only factor. There are other factors, as well – what are somebody’s strengths, for example. A blog like mine that deals in issues and ideas may not engender trust if the style is contrary to my strengths. Here, the Clifton StrengthsFinder extrapolates on what I’m good at.
And, finally, a more subtle issue: How does a wine writer work? What’s their working personality? Are they subject to irrationality and flights of fancy that impact the quality of their work? The Meyers-Briggs Type Indicator® measures psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions.
These factors combined:
* What is your wine knowledge base?
* What do you do well / what are your strengths?
* How do you perceive the world and make decisions / what’s your style?
* Are you trustworthy?
All make up the whole person that fills in the credibility gaps that are otherwise deficient in a one-dimensional view of a writer through his or her writings.
So, I’ve created my own equation. If you know me, you would know that a math equation is the last thing that’s a strength, but this is relatively simple. My equation says: Respect = Your Knowledge + Your Strengths + Your Style divided by your Trust Quotient.

Assuming that those factors come out positively, than, ultimately, an online wine writer should stand in judgment against any other wine writer regardless of the masthead they write for.
In that vein, here are is the $100 bucks worth of analysis that I’ve spent to understand myself a little bit better. As my profiles indicate, I’m driven, work towards expertise, I’m self-confident, strategic and an achiever. To that end, I’m willing to stand in the court of public opinion in order to earn your trust and respect.
Jeff Lefevere’s Knowledge (Goodgrape.com archives from 01/05 – 02/11)
Jeff Lefevere’s Trust Quotient (initiates a PDF download of my actual report)
Jeff Lefevere’s StrengthsFinder (initiates a PDF download of my actual report)
Jeff Lefevere’s Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (initiates a PDF download of my actual report)
Finally, if it seems like I’m defensive, I’m not. My personality profile indicates that I’m a leader, responsible and accountable; it’s a mantle I take on for all online wine writers.
Source: http://goodgrape.com/index.php/site/online_wine_writing_and_the_trust_divide1/
Beau Sejour Becot Beau Site Beaumont Beausejour Becot Beausejour Duffau Lagarrosse
Brown Calon Segur Cambon la Pelouse Canon Canon la Gaffeliere
Ducru Beaucaillou Duhart Milon Duhart Milon Rothschild Exception de Quinault Ferriere
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/gangofpour/uncZ/~3/9nBkXe6Mch8/florida-jim-cowans-2011-tasting-notes
California Vinyard Wine Bottle Types of Wine Food and Wine Leisure Food
La Croix de Beaucaillou La Croix du Casse La Fleur Cardinale La Fleur de Bouard La Fleur de Gay
Wine Making Wine Tasting Yellow Tail Cabernet Wine and Roses
Odds and ends from a life lived through the prism of the wine glass …
The Best Blog that’s not a Blog Pt. II
I’ve mentioned Garagiste and their daily email wine sales offers in the past. The Seattle-based wine purveyor is notable not just for their wine offerings (which are stunning), but also for how that offer is presented—their long-form daily email missives represent some of the best wine writing found anywhere.
For entirely different reasons, you can add Bottlenotes to that list as well (subscribe to their email at this link). If you’re not already a subscriber to Bottlenotes daily email, The Daily Sip, you should be. Since hiring Eric Arnold (ex-Wine Spectator and author of First Big Crush) as Editorial Director in April of last year, Bottlenotes has come to represent one of the best daily wine-related reads anywhere.

Taking a less wine-specific approach and focusing on wine people, personalities and stories, Arnold has proven he has a nose for interesting angles while asking the right questions. His writing leaves a reader satisfied with something they didn’t know beforehand, a neat trick given that every single wine-interested reader comes at the subject with a different point of view and knowledge base.
Case in point: Recently, Arnold featured a little known documentary making the rounds of screenings that features Julian Faulkner, a young Provence winemaker, and his struggles in the global marketplace. Arnold’s interview with Faulkner’s New York-based importer (Brian DiMarco of Barterhouse) caused me to pluck my wallet out of my pocket and buy the DVD. The documentary called “Escaping Robert Parker” uses Parker as the foil for the idealistic Faulkner, perhaps not as successfully as Arnold’s writing intrigues, but the documentary is wholly satisfying none the less.
In the documentary, Faulkner discusses a good wine not as a vehicle for critical acclaim, but as being good when it, “Gives pleasure.” It’s an oft-repeated phrase from the anti-Parker set, but Faulkner’s earnestness sells it as meaningful.
Overall, Arnold’s daily writing and the documentary are both satisfying ways to spend time if you’re a wine enthusiast.
Escaping Education
Speaking of “Escaping Robert Parker” and wine that, “Gives pleasure,” Elin McCoy (author of The Emperor of Wine), is featured in several vignettes in the documentary discussing the state of popular wine criticism – a part of wine appreciation that she describes as a declining need for younger wine consumers.
The role of the wine critic is a complicated subject, not easily placed within a neat box and a subject in which any opinion could be held up as having a shred of truth to it. Yet, in general, McCoy’s notion that critical scores are less important to younger wine consumers rings true.

I believe that not only is the role of the critic changing, but so too is the notion of education.
Historically, the wine business has lived off the “core” wine consumer – the small percentage of wine drinkers that drive over 90% of wine sales. So, when you see research from the Wine Market Council that indicates 1 in 2 Millenials are coming into wine as a “core” consumer it’s easy to see why the industry is excited.
By sheer numbers, life is good and going to get better ... from a volume sales perspective.
However, the wine industry in a macro sense encompasses more than just wine – it also includes all of the peripheral activities that educate about wine, as well – magazines, books, events, etc. and the entire picture can’t be viewed through rose colored glasses.
It’s the education portion that I think is in for the most dynamic change over the course of the next decade.
In large part, wine enthusiasm is a singular pursuit and serious wine lovers are known for being inveterate learners – reading books, educating themselves, tasting, traveling and then reading some more.
However, anecdotally, I’m seeing significantly less interest in younger consumers learning about wine as avocation, and instead merely looking at wine as something that, “Gives pleasure,” as Julian Faulkner so noted.
Last weekend my wife and I held an engagement party for my 26-year-old sister-in-law, her fiancé and their wedding party, all the same age, all 25 or 26 years old. The party was wine themed. Everybody was wine-interested. A lot of wine was drunk. My takeaway is that the importance of wine in that setting is its role as a social beverage. Education or knowledge aside from the correct pronunciation of names and regions and whether or not the wine is good (or not) is about all that matters, even amongst people with the same interest.
The implications for this can’t be understated. There was no geek talk. No discussions of alcohol percentages, styles, or anything remotely deeper than enjoying each other’s company with a glass of vino. This amongst a wine crowd.
I might be crazy, but if I were a wine educator, or a wine writer that focused on education, I would shift my focus not on the minutia of wine appreciation, but on the mechanics of how to say Chateauneuf-du-Pape without looking like an idiot alongside reviewing wine faults. That’s it.
How do you pronounce it and is it good, bad, or flawed?
Everything else is details, and, well, nowadays, there’s enough going on without needless detail…Right?
Source: http://goodgrape.com/index.php/site/field_notes_from_a_wine_life_benign_apathy_edition/
La Tour Haut Brion La Tour Martillac Labegorce Zede Lafite Rothschild Lafleur